Franchise Facts Report → compare → Kilwins vs Mrs. Fields and
Kilwins vs Mrs. Fields and
Two food & beverage franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| Kilwins | Mrs. Fields and | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $405,045 – $880,295 | $309,500 – $493,850 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | $45,000 | $35,000 |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | 5% | 6% |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Yes | Yes |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | $951,795 | $365,166 |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 181 | 98 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | +13 | -15 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 2.4% | 17.7% |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Risk level our read | Medium | Medium |
| FDD year registration | 2026 | 2026 |
Are Kilwins and Mrs. Fields and the same company?
No — Kilwins and Mrs. Fields and are franchised by separate companies. Kilwins's franchisor is Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc.; Mrs. Fields and's is Mrs. Fields Franchising, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
Mrs. Fields and is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $309,500 – $493,850, against $405,045 – $880,295 for Kilwins.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Kilwins reports the higher figure ($951,795 vs $365,166). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.
Closures & failure rate
Kilwins reports 181 franchised outlets, net change +13 in the latest reported year, a 2.4% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Mrs. Fields and reports 98 franchised outlets, net change -15 in the latest reported year, a 17.7% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against food & beverage medians.
Litigation
Kilwins discloses 1 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceeding in FDD Item 3. Mrs. Fields and discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against food & beverage peers.
Only looking at one of them?
Kilwins vs Mrs. Fields and — frequently asked
Are Kilwins and Mrs. Fields and the same company?
No — Kilwins and Mrs. Fields and are franchised by separate companies. Kilwins's franchisor is Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc.; Mrs. Fields and's is Mrs. Fields Franchising, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between Kilwins and Mrs. Fields and?
Kilwins and Mrs. Fields and are food & beverage franchises from different franchisors (Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc. and Mrs. Fields Franchising, LLC). Mrs. Fields and is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $309,500 – $493,850, against $405,045 – $880,295 for Kilwins. Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Kilwins reports the higher figure ($951,795 vs $365,166). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.
Is Kilwins more profitable than Mrs. Fields and?
Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Kilwins reports the higher figure ($951,795 vs $365,166). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.
Which is cheaper to open — Kilwins or Mrs. Fields and?
Mrs. Fields and is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $309,500 – $493,850, against $405,045 – $880,295 for Kilwins.
Is Kilwins or Mrs. Fields and growing faster?
Kilwins reports 181 franchised outlets, net change +13 in the latest reported year, a 2.4% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Mrs. Fields and reports 98 franchised outlets, net change -15 in the latest reported year, a 17.7% closure rate (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Food & beverage rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Kilwins 2026, Mrs. Fields and 2026). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.