Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Body20 vs Moms on the Run

Body20 vs Moms on the Run

Fitness · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two fitness franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

Body20Moms on the Run
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$309,249 – $473,369 $13,900 – $21,105
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$65,000 $1,000
Royalty
FDD Item 6
8%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Not disclosed Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
in report
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
25
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
-11
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
16.7%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
disclosed 0
Risk level
our read
Medium Medium
FDD year
registration
2026 2024

Are Body20 and Moms on the Run the same company?

No — Body20 and Moms on the Run are franchised by separate companies. Body20's franchisor is Body20 Franchisor LLC; Moms on the Run's is MOMS ON THE RUN LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Moms on the Run is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $13,900 – $21,105, against $309,249 – $473,369 for Body20.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only Moms on the Run disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Body20's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Body20's outlet table did not parse cleanly — see its FDD Item 20. Moms on the Run reports 25 franchised outlets, net change -11 in the latest reported year, a 16.7% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against fitness medians.

Litigation

Body20 discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report). Moms on the Run discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against fitness peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Body20 vs Moms on the Run — frequently asked

Are Body20 and Moms on the Run the same company?

No — Body20 and Moms on the Run are franchised by separate companies. Body20's franchisor is Body20 Franchisor LLC; Moms on the Run's is MOMS ON THE RUN LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Body20 and Moms on the Run?

Body20 and Moms on the Run are fitness franchises from different franchisors (Body20 Franchisor LLC and MOMS ON THE RUN LLC). Moms on the Run is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $13,900 – $21,105, against $309,249 – $473,369 for Body20. Only Moms on the Run disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Body20's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Body20 more profitable than Moms on the Run?

Only Moms on the Run disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Body20's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Body20 or Moms on the Run?

Moms on the Run is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $13,900 – $21,105, against $309,249 – $473,369 for Body20.

Is Body20 or Moms on the Run growing faster?

Body20's outlet table did not parse cleanly — see its FDD Item 20. Moms on the Run reports 25 franchised outlets, net change -11 in the latest reported year, a 16.7% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Body20 franchise facts$309,249 – $473,369 · medium risk Moms on the Run franchise facts$13,900 – $21,105 · medium risk

Fitness rankings

Best gym & fitness franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest gym & fitness franchises to openFastest-growing gym & fitness franchisesGym & fitness franchises ranked by average revenueGym & fitness franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsGym & fitness franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsLowest-churn gym & fitness franchisesLowest-royalty gym & fitness franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Body20 2026, Moms on the Run 2024). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.